Click to edit...
Moving on methane emissions
Methane emissions make up a significant percentage of the environmental pollution created by the oil and gas industry, and companies are now beginning to react. Shell, BP and Total have pledged to reduce emissions, but how are they going about it? Molly Lempriere investigates
ethane is often overlooked as a dangerous emission. Despite its potency as a greenhouse gas (GHG), the prevalence of carbon has led to the focus remaining firmly on combatting CO2 emissions.
In the oil and gas industry, methane is often just burnt off in flaring, however in recent years a number of the major oil and gas producers have pledged to reduce their methane emissions in an effort to improve the environmental impact of their operations.
“Methane is a more potent GHG than CO2,” explains a Shell spokesperson. “It has 34 times the global warming potential of CO2 over a 100-year time frame, according to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report.”
Earlier this year Shell was applauded by the UN after committing to keep its methane intensity below 0.2% by 2025 across all of its oil and gas operations. But how is it going about this change, and what other companies doing to tackle methane?
Tackling emissions through technology and leadership
Currently, oil and gas operations are responsible for 31% of methane emissions in the US. This makes the industry the single biggest contributor; in 2017, Shell alone produced 123,000t of methane, equivalent to 5% of the company’s total emissions.
“To maintain this methane target, Shell is implementing programmes, including using infrared cameras to scan for methane emissions, deploying advanced technology to repair leaks, and replacing high-bleed pneumatically-operated controllers with low emission alternatives,” says a Shell spokesperson.
Monitoring technologies will help to minimise methane lost through leaks, or fugitive emissions
Improvements in technologies will likely play a large role in reducing emissions. In particular, monitoring technologies will help to minimise methane lost through leaks, or fugitive emissions, which some studies estimate accounts for as much as 90% of emissions. If those leaks can be quickly and efficiently identified and fixed, it could dramatically reduce emissions.
“Shell is involved in a broad range of initiatives focused on reducing the emissions intensity of methane throughout the full supply chain – from production to the final consumer,” says the spokesperson. “For example, in 2017, Shell brought together industry, international institutions, non-governmental organisations and academics to develop a set of Methane Guiding Principles, which focus on continually working to reduce emissions of methane throughout the gas industry and have now been signed by 16 companies.”
Reducing routine flaring
A further cause of methane emissions, which happens during the production and refining of oil and gas, is flaring. A colossal 143 billion cubic metres of methane-rich gas, or 3.5% of the world’s total gas production, is flared every year.
“Shell has been an active member of the World Bank-sponsored Global Gas Flaring Reduction partnership since 2002,” continues the spokesperson. “As part of the partnership, the World Bank has developed the Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 initiative, which Shell signed in 2015. This encourages governments, companies and development organisations to work together to end flaring.”
Shell's industry-leading target makes clear that the race to near-zero methane emissions is on
A number of technologies are under development that would be able to capture and utilise the methane currently flared during oil and gas operations. These include a method developed by MIT that can turn methane into methanol, which can then be sold on. Should such technologies prove financially beneficial, they could go a long way to reducing emissions.
"Shell's industry-leading target makes clear that the race to near-zero methane emissions is on," senior director at Environmental Defense Fund Ben Ratner said in a statement. "Strong commitments like this suggest to investors, governments, and business partners alike that an operator is serious about its positioning in a cleaner energy economy."
An industry-wide movement
Other industry players have set similar targets to reduce their methane emissions, including a pledge made by members of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI) in September.
“Our aim is to work towards near-zero methane emissions from the full gas value chain in support of achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement. We have worked to make our ambition concrete, actionable and measurable, helping to ensure that natural gas can realise its full potential in a low-emissions future,” the heads of the OGCI member companies said.
BP and Total are both members of the OGCI, along with other major industry players. In May, Exxon Mobil announced that it would be reducing its emissions by 20% by 2020.
“Achieving the agreed intensity target of 0.25% by the end of 2025 would reduce collective emissions by 350,000t of methane annually, compared to the baseline of 0.32% in 2017,” according to the OGCI.
Collaboration and company commitment will be essential if reductions are to have a meaningful impact
This could make a huge difference to the industry’s methane emissions, at a crucial time in efforts to reduce greenhouse gases.
There is still a way to go however, and continued collaboration and company commitment will be essential if reductions are to have a meaningful impact.
"Follow through with good data and transparency are vital – as is leadership in standing up for strong, sensible methane policy that can improve performance across the industry," Ratner added.
Leadership is particularly pressing, as despite a commitment in 2016 by the US, Canadian and Mexican governments to move on methane emissions, little has been achieved. As such, it is time for the oil and gas industry themselves to step up.
“This is an industry wide issue and we need to fix this fast,” said Shell director of integrated gas and new energies, Maarten Wetselaar. “We must get a much more accurate understanding of how much we are emitting.”
Share this article